Paris Agreement Compatible Sectoral Benchmarks
While national emission trends are a useful tool for measuring government progress towards meeting the Paris Agreement 1.5˚C temperature limit at a global level, each government will have to address its own sectors, each with their own, different baseline. What should government sectoral benchmarks be? Will they meet the global carbon budget
The Climate Action Tracker (CAT) has defined and analysed a global-level series of Paris Agreement-compatible benchmarks, across four major sectors – Power, Transport, Industry, and Buildings – and for seven individual countries – Brazil, China, EU, India, Indonesia, South Africa and the US. Within each sector, we define benchmarks for several separate but complementary indicators.
The CAT has developed the benchmarks for both 2030 and 2050, with additional temporal resolution depending on the approach and indicator.
- Global decarbonisation by 2050 means that, on average, all sectors need to decarbonise on the same timeframe
- Benchmarks differ in terms of timing between countries and sectors but converge closer to 2050
- Benchmarks useful to policymakers guide which interventions are needed
- Progress by 2030 is important to keep carbon budgets within reach
- Power sector is making progress in decarbonising and should remain a government priority
- Industry, transport, buildings need to advance significantly
Paris Agreement-compatible sectoral benchmarks
Why do we need sectoral benchmarks?
To inform policy improvements and to gauge the state of transformational change – whether it is already underway, or more action is required – we need more granular information than the Paris Agreement’s goal of limiting warming to well below 2°C and to pursue efforts to limit it to 1.5°C. Sectoral indicators and benchmarks (such as, in the power sector, identifying the necessary share of renewable energy required to meet the Paris Agreement temperature goal) allow us to track the various elements of action that together will allow us to meet the global temperature goal.
Compared to national total greenhouse gas emissions, sectoral indicators and benchmarks speak more closely to those making the relevant decisions and help to map out pathways to a Paris-compatible world in more detail.
What are the main challenges in determining sectoral benchmarks?
The main challenge in defining the sectoral benchmarks is that a global temperature goal cannot unambiguously be translated into individual actions. Different strategies could be used to meet the long-term goal; e.g. by assigning more reductions to specific sectors, as long as the overall emissions budget is met (since the overall budget determines the long-term temperature increase).
A good starting point can be to ask whether a sector can decarbonise by 2050, and if not, why?
What is the rationale behind the benchmarks?
The Climate Action Tracker team defines detailed Paris Agreement compatible sectoral benchmarks as a level of an indicator that would be “sufficient” for national action to decarbonise sectors in line with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5˚C temperature limit. We set our benchmarks at a level of “highest plausible ambition,” which means they:
- are generally technically and economically feasible within the foreseeable future
- take into consideration current circumstances in terms of existing infrastructure and institutions in individual countries
- ensure that the benchmarks push boundaries on all levels and increase our chances of collectively meeting the Paris temperature limit
We do not predetermine how governments should reach a benchmark but can show that it is possible through one or more decarbonisation routes
How are the benchmarks determined?
In defining the sectoral benchmarks, we use multiple sources of information as input and take informed decisions on the basis of the available data. The input data includes:
A literature review, comprised of:
- Global scenarios of emissions limits to meet the Paris Agreement goal
- Sectoral technology scenarios
- Recent technological trends and potential new developments
- Most ambitious projects, targets, or goals*
Our own analysis of scenarios
- Analysis based on existing global model-based scenarios
- Development and application of our own sectoral models
The results of the literature review and our own analysis are combined to identify the “highest plausible ambition” benchmarks for each sector. This step requires explicit decisions or selection of what is considered highest plausible ambition, which we explain individually for each sector in our detailed methods report.
How is equity taken into consideration when defining the benchmarks?
The benchmarks defined above consider the extent to which each sector should be decarbonised within the bounds of a given nation (or globally) to be compatible with the Paris Agreement, irrespective of who pays for this transition.
The very limited carbon budget does not leave much room for some countries to decarbonise more slowly based on differences in their historic responsibilities or current capabilities. As the Paris Agreement requires full decarbonisation by mid-century there will be a need for financial transfers and other support between countries, so the development described by the benchmarks is fair and just. But the extent of this support and how it can be achieved is a separate political discussion that could not be covered in this analysis.
Some aspects of social and climate fairness we have implicitly taken into consideration when determining the benchmarks. In general, we focus on convergence of efficiencies (e.g. share of renewables or emissions per tonne of steel) while the activities are growing faster in developing countries and are often declining in developed countries. We also account for different paces of decarbonisation between countries and potential co-benefits in each sector.
Unabated: the Carbon Capture and Storage 86 billion tonne carbon bomb aimed at derailing a fossil phase out
The climate talks at COP28 have centred around the need for a fossil fuel phase out. Our analysis quantifies the risk posed by restricting a phase out commitment to only ‘unabated’ fossil fuels.
No change to warming as fossil fuel endgame brings focus onto false solutions
The CAT's annual warming estimate has risen by 0.1˚C to 2.5˚C. The estimate is largely influenced by weak existing targets rather than shifts triggered by updated Nationally Determined Contributions.
When will global greenhouse gas emissions peak?
The IPCC says peaking before 2025 is a critical step to keep the 1.5°C limit within reach. With emissions set to rise in 2023, this leaves limited time to act. To assess if we can meet this milestone, we look at when global emissions might peak, as well as what we can do to get there in time.
Wind and solar benchmarks for a 1.5°C world
This report presents a detailed methodology for determining the amount of wind and solar capacity that is required for a country to align with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C temperature goal. While the focus of the report is the method, it includes illustrative benchmarks for Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Germany, South Africa.
A 1.5°C future is possible: getting fossil fuels out of the Philippine power sector
The Philippines is also one of the fastest-growing developing countries: poverty is in decline, access to energy is rising and, with that, demand for energy services. However, fossil fuels still dominate the energy system, accounting for 78% of power generation in 2022. This report sets out what the Philippines government needs to do to get the country’s power sector onto a 1.5˚C compatible emissions pathway, replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy.
Production Gap Report 2023
Governments, in aggregate, still plan to produce more than double the amount of fossil fuels in 2030 than would be consistent with limiting warming to 1.5°C. The persistence of the global production gap puts a well-managed and equitable energy transition at risk.
Emissions impossible: Unpacking CSIRO GISERA Beetaloo Middle Arm fossil gas emissions estimates
This report provides an independent evaluation of the CSIRO and GISERA assessments of the potential greenhouse gas emissions that would result from the exploitation of the Beetaloo fossil shale gas reserves.
Adjusting 1.5°C climate change mitigation pathways in light of adverse new information
This study uses an integrated assessment model to explore how 1.5°C pathways could adjust in light of new adverse information, such as a reduced 1.5°C carbon budget, or slower-than-expected low-carbon technology deployment.
Railway development: lessons for the EU
This paper analyses how EU railway policy for a low-carbon future can be enhanced, drawing insights from Japan and Switzerland.
Ramping up energy storage: lessons for the EU
This paper explores how the EU can enhance its policy for a low-carbon future by learning from successful energy storage approaches in California, South Korea, and Australia.