Progress on Loss and Damage in Katowice
Olivia Serdeczny, Dawn Pierre-Nathoniel, Linda Siegele
At COP24, developing countries were calling for the inclusion of Loss and Damage in the transparency framework and the Global Stocktake.
We can now say: they succeeded.
Under the newly adopted guidelines for implementing the Paris Agreement, vulnerable countries will have a place to report climate-related losses, what they are doing to deal with them, which could well include the information on the help they need. What is more, assessing information on loss and damage will be part of the five-yearly exercise of evaluating the progress towards implementing the Paris Agreement.
As far as Loss and Damage is concerned, the Katowice climate talks delivered a solid outcome. Loss and Damage is reflected under a separate heading in the guidelines of the transparency framework's section on Impacts and Adaptation. Under the transparency framework, all countries report on the action they have taken to address climate change. The framework is extremely important, as commitments under the Paris Agreement are all voluntary. Transparency is an important tool to check if countries are fulfilling their own goals.
Including Loss and Damage under the transparency framework will enable countries to officially report on the impacts they have suffered in the past and expect to happen in the future, the current and planned activities to avert, minimise and address loss and damage, and the institutional arrangements to implement these activities.
Alongside reporting, they are also free to communicate what kind of support they need to address loss and damage. What is more, reports generated under the transparency framework will be an important input into the comprehensive five-yearly assessment of progress on climate action – the Global Stocktake.
The second key outcome of COP24 on Loss and Damage is that governments have created a space for information on loss and damage to be collected and synthesised as part of the Global Stocktake. It is also important the sources of input for the global stocktake will consider information on averting, minimizing and addressing loss and damage.
The need for scientific information
This is all great news. But it also means a lot of work ahead. Countries will need to actually report their experiences and activities – implemented and planned – in terms of loss and damage. They often lack the capacities to do this.
Information that will feed into the Global Stocktake includes scientific information summarised by the IPCC – this information will need to be generated in the first place. The inclusion of information on loss and damage in the recently published Special Report on 1.5°C is a great first step in this regard. Following the adoption of the Paris Agreement rule book, systematic inclusion of information on loss and damage in the upcoming Special Reports and Sixth Assessment Report is just the more important.
The already booming scientific literature on adaptation limits, observed impacts and attribution will be ever more relevant. Indeed, there is scope for Parties to communicate under Article 7 on the limits to adaptation. Some countries have even gone as far as including a chapter in their National Adaptation Plans that specifically address “limits to adaptation” and loss and damage. Insights into risk management approaches taken by countries to prepare for and address unavoided climate impacts will also be dearly needed.
The Paris Agreement rule book has opened the opportunity to feed these kinds of information into the political process. There is reason to hope that this process will create the evidence-base to comprehensively reflect the costs of climate change, and to inform policy responses to foreseeable unavoidable impacts. This means – all hands on deck to help countries in their reporting and to create the scientific foundation for informed collective action.
COP28: social and economic metrics could serve as stepping stone for Global Goal on Adaptation
As work on shaping the Global Goal on Adaptation culminates this week at COP28, we explore if social and economic metrics could be used as proxies for a country’s ability to adapt.
Safeguards and exit points for the World Bank as host of the Loss and Damage Fund
An agreement was reached to establish the World Bank as the interim host of the Loss and Damage Fund. Developing countries signed up to this on certain conditions. We unpack the safeguards put in place and look at the three points at which the Fund could exit the World Bank.
Beetaloo gas field is a climate bomb. How did CSIRO modelling make it look otherwise?
The fossil gas industry is gearing up for a truly enormous new fracking project in the Northern Territory’s Beetaloo Basin that could undo all Australia's efforts to cut emissions.
From droughts to floods: how Eastern African countries are responding to the rising El Niño and Indian Ocean Dipole
The Horn of Africa looks set to go from one disaster to another as floods intensified by a rising El Niño and a positive Indian Ocean Dipole are predicted to follow a prolonged drought. We take a look at climate policies in the region and what countries are doing to prepare for compound extreme events.
The just transition looks different for small islands – their voices must be heard
The concept of a just transition is gaining momentum, yet it’s too often viewed through a developed country lens in international climate talks and discussions often ignore the links to climate justice. The unique concerns of small islands must be heard to ensure the just transition works for all.
Overshoot Commission’s veneer of neutrality is solar radiation modification PR by stealth
Calls for a moratorium on solar radiation modification (SRM) today by the Overshoot Commission seem sensible – such sun-blocking technologies are highly risky. Yet in the same breath, the Commission appears to encourage moratorium-busting SRM testing, begging the question – is their new report a trojan horse?
Loss and damage: two options in play for fund’s makeup
There are currently two options on the table for the loss and damage fund’s structure – ‘programmatic’ and ‘responsive’. We reflect on the pros and cons of each.
El Niño is contributing to the hottest temperatures ever recorded – what does this mean for the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C limit?
Extreme weather is raging across the northern hemisphere. Our experts explain the implications of the emerging El Niño for our changing climate.