Home
Briefings
Tools
Latest
Media Coverage
What we do
Science Assessment and Analysis
Sea level rise
Ocean acidification
Climate sensitivity and feedbacks
Probabilistic climate projections
Emission pathways and climate goals
Role of Non-CO2 gases and air pollutants
Climate Impacts and Risk Assessment
Risks to Sustainable Development
Climate Risk Indicators
Impacts and Vulnerability
Mitigation Scenarios and Pathways
Emission reduction targets
Carbon and Emission budgets
Mitigation costs
Co-benefits
Role of Air Pollutants
Climate Negotiations
Development of New Climate Agreement
Review of 2oC Goal
Kyoto Protocol
Assessment of INDCs
Real-time assessment of options
Negotiation Support
Capacity building and knowledge sharing
High Level Support
Real-Time Support
Climate Action Tracker
CAT Updates
CAT Blog
Climate Policy Analysis
Mitigation options and adequacy of action
Emissions Gap Assessment
Co-benefits of mitigation
Equity options and analyses
Assessment of INDCs
Climate Finance
Assessment of climate finance needs
National and Regional Readiness
Green Climate Fund
Tracking Climate Finance
Institutional Design of Climate Finance
Implementation Strategies
National and Regional Adaptation
Support in formulation of INDCs
Regional Capacity Building
Global consequences
National actions
Adaptation and Loss and Damage
Adaptation gap assessments
Adaptation options
Costs and benefits of adaptation
Costs of residual damages
Loss and Damage
Publications
Events
Projects
About us
Team
Work with us
Media
Partners and Funders
Contact
Blog
Home
Publications
2011
Discrepancies in historical emissions point to a wider 2020 gap between 2°C benchmarks and aggregated national mitigation pledges
Date Published
2011, January 01
Authors
Joeri Rogelj, Hare William, Claudine Chen, Malte Meinshausen
