10 December, 2019

Update: the dangers of blue carbon offsets: from hot air to hot water?

Authors

Claire Fyson, Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, Bill Hare

As the interest in using nature-based solutions to mitigate climate change grows, ‘blue carbon,’ which means carbon sequestered in coastal ecosystems, is also garnering attention. A number of countries have proposed including blue carbon in their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), and there is growing interest among some governments and fossil fuel companies in blue carbon as an offset mechanism.

This briefing unpacks the key challenges and risks associated with the blue carbon concept by considering three key questions. What is the real potential of blue carbon as a mitigation measure? To what extent is carbon storage in coastal ecosystems threatened by current and future climate impacts? And is there a danger that focus on blue carbon could detract from reducing emissions from fossil fuel use?

Blue carbon refers to the carbon sequestered in coastal ecosystems – namely mangroves, sea grasses and salt marshes.

Key messages

Using blue carbon to achieve national mitigation targets risks diluting mitigation ambition in other sectors, which could jeopardise our ability to limit warming to 1.5°C. Blue carbon must not be a replacement for rapid emissions reductions in other sectors.

The climate effects of carbon stored in natural ecosystems and carbon emissions from fossil fuels are not equivalent. This means any attempts to measure and set targets for carbon sequestration in coastal ecosystems should be kept separate from emissions targets in other sectors. Lessons from accounting for carbon flows in land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) have shown that integrating nature-based mitigation offsets under national mitigation targets creates loopholes, hot air, and measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) challenges.

Under present reporting and accounting arrangements losses from extreme events and climatic disturbances do not have to be counted by governments as emissions. For blue carbon, this would mean that the losses of carbon from marine heatwaves, sea level rise extreme events or multiple stressors would not be recorded in national emissions accounts, even though the prior storage of carbon could have been counted as a sink towards climate targets. Recent die-back of coastal ecosystems during heatwaves (e.g. in Shark Bay, Australia) have illustrated how significant the losses of carbon can be.

Focusing on the climate sequestration component of coastal ecosystems within a mitigation context is also problematic because their potential to reduce emissions and draw down CO2 from the atmosphere is highly uncertain and too small to be an effective mitigation strategy. The IPCC found that coastal ‘blue carbon’ ecosystems have a limited global sequestration potential of about 0.5% of present day emissions annually (SROCC, IPCC 2019).

Ecosystem restoration may only provide benefits if global emissions remain low. The vulnerability of coastal ecosystems to climate change impacts means that the effectiveness with which they draw down carbon and the permanence of their carbon storage may be jeopardised under the levels of warming and sea level rise implied by the current set of emission reduction commitments (Nationally Determined Contributions or NDCs).

According to the IPCC, exceeding 1.5°C would lead to the near-complete loss of tropical corals, and warming of 3°C or more – where current NDCs are taking us – would lead to high to very high risks for many coastal ecosystems (including seagrass, salt marshes and kelp forests) (SROCC IPCC 2019).

It is essential to prevent the degradation of coastal ecosystems, but carbon sequestration is not necessarily the most valuable service these ecosystems provide. The wealth of potential co-benefits from coastal ecosystem conservation and restoration, beyond carbon sequestration, are justification enough for schemes to incentivise their protection. Additionally, there are substantial capacity constraints for the measurement of ecosystem-related carbon fluxes in many developing countries.

In summary, the science is very clear: protecting coastal ecosystems and the valuable services they provide – including in adaptation – requires rapid emissions reductions in all sectors to limit warming to 1.5°C. High uncertainties and impermanence pose significant risks to the use of blue carbon removals as an offset for other emissions (e.g. natural gas emissions) remaining high, or their transfer in the Paris Agreement’s market mechanisms. Treating nature-based mitigation as equivalent to any other form of mitigation could have dangerous consequences for the ecosystems that such measures would seek to protect.

Publications

Humid heat exceeds human tolerance limits and causes mass mortality

With critical physiological limits to human heat tolerance drawing ever closer, this Comment highlights the urgent need to limit further climate warming and emphasises the adaptation challenge ahead.

1.5°C-aligned 2030 and 2035 GHG emissions targets

We have produced factsheets for Australia, China, the EU, India, Indonesia and USA showing 2030 and 2035 greenhouse gas emission reduction milestones for each jurisdiction to align with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C goal – both including and excluding land use, land-use change and forestry.

Spatially resolved emulated annual temperature projections for overshoot pathways

This study presents a new dataset of annual temperature projections for different overshoot pathways (when the 1.5 °C of global warming limit is exceeded). The data offers a unique opportunity to study local and regional climate change impacts of a range of overshoot scenarios, including when temperature thresholds might be exceeded, and by how much.

Geological Net Zero and the need for disaggregated accounting for carbon sinks

This study in Nature show that definitions of net zero now in widespread use will not actually stop global warming. The paper demonstrates that relying on natural carbon sinks, such as in forests or oceans, to 'offset' ongoing fossil fuel emissions will lead to continued warming.

Climate Action Tracker: 2024 warming projection update

Despite an escalating climate crisis marked by unprecedented wildfires, storms, floods, and droughts, the Climate Action Tracker annual global temperature update shows global warming projections for 2100 are flatlining, with no improvement since 2021. The aggregate effect of current policies set the world on a path toward 2.7°C of warming.

Decarbonising light-duty vehicle road transport

The Climate Action Tracker provides updated 1.5ºC compatible benchmarks for the transport sector for the world as a whole and for seven individual countries; the US, EU, China, India, Brazil, South Africa and Indonesia.

Emissions Gap Report 2024: No more hot air … please!

The 2024 edition of UNEP’s Emissions Gap Report shows how much higher nations must aim. To get on a least-cost pathway for 1.5°C, emissions must fall 42 per cent by 2030, compared to 2019 levels. G20 nations, particularly the largest-emitting members, would need to do the heavy lifting.

The role of northern forests in limiting warming to 1.5°C

Northern forests are critical in the race to net zero CO₂ by mid-century. Protecting and restoring these forests, alongside steep and rapid reductions in fossil fuel emissions, is essential both to mitigating emissions and to supporting forest ecosystem services and biodiversity.

Methodology underpinning the State of Climate Action series: 2024 update

This technical note describes the State of Climate Action series’ methodology for identifying sectors that must transform, translating these transformations into global mitigation targets primarily for 2030, 2035 and 2050 and selecting indicators with datasets to monitor annual change. It also outlines the report’s approach for assessing progress made toward near-term targets and comparing trends over time.

Rapid urbanisation and climate change key drivers of dramatic flood impacts in Nepal

New study finds the devastating floods in Nepal late September were exacerbated by rapid urbanisation and climate change. The analysis found the relentless rain, which fell on saturated ground in the late monsoon, was made at least 10% heavier and 70% more likely by climate change.

LNG shipbuilding industry heading to huge oversupply

The LNG shipbuilding industry appears to be doubling down on building new carriers, ignoring the global shift to a low carbon economy and putting itself into an even worse oversupply situation than a year ago, we find in our updated report.

Seasonal forecast of two-metre temperature and precipitation in Tanzania: A hybrid cluster and point-by-point machine learning approach

Seasonal forecasting of atmospheric parameters is important in various fields including agriculture. This study tests how machine learning can complement dynamic models using Tanzanian seasonal forecasts and finds this process uses far less computational power.

About us

Decarbonisation targets and 1.5℃ pathways

Comment