Australia’s largest liquefied natural gas producer, Woodside, plans a regional hub on the Burrup Peninsula in Western Australia, which would enable it to develop trillions of cubic feet of gas over the next decades. This report outlines the implications of the emissions Burrup Hub would produce on Western Australia’s ability to meet its climate targets.
This study analyses the impact of the Burrup Hub LNG projects for Western Australia’s carbon budget under the Paris Agreement and its net zero emissions 2050 goal. It builds on the comprehensive study we published earlier on Western Australia’s carbon budget under the Paris Agreement, which developed sectoral and overall benchmarks for Western Australia’s emissions pathway.
This study finds that the Burrup Hub - as proposed - is not consistent with Western Australia implementing the Paris Agreement and achieving its objective of net zero emissions by 2050, nor with the national and global emission reductions necessary to implement the Paris Agreement.
This is in stark contrast with the claims by the project proponents, Woodside, that emissions from the project are “acceptable” and that the impact is “low”. This report shows that the likely scale of domestic emissions from the Burrup Hub will significantly undermine the ability of WA and Australia to meet Paris Agreement targets and, at best, could force other sectors to make much deeper reductions.
The report also shows the total GHG intensity of LNG produced from the North West Shelf (NWS) LNG plant component of the Burrup Hub is likely to increase by 75% from about 0.4 tCO2e/LNG produced to over 0.7 tCO2e/LNG by 2030 as it sources gas from the CO2-intensive Browse development.
The fast ramping up of LNG processing has made the biggest contribution to the increase of greenhouse gas emissions in Western Australia in the last ten to fifteen years. In 2005, the LNG sector emitted about 6% of WA’s 2005 GHG emissions (excluding LULUCF). Emissions have tripled and have risen, we estimate, to about 23% of the State’s 2017 GHG emissions.
As of 2019, the LNG facilities within the Burrup Hub had a share of about 9% of WA’s GHG emissions (excl. LULUCF), and these CO2 emissions have nearly doubled since 2005 – and are set to nearly double again by the early 2030s.
We estimate the total Western Australia LNG industry emissions at about 22 Mt CO2e per annum in 2019 and this can be expected to approach 30 Mt CO2e per annum by the late 2020s. The Burrup Hub contributes about half of this (~16 Mt CO2e per annum), and the NWS Plant alone contributes about a third (estimated average of 10 Mt CO2e per annum) of the total emissions over the proposed lifetime until 2070. The NWS plant emissions are likely to be close to 12 Mt CO2e per annum in the 2030s when this plant can be expected to be using Browse-sourced gas at a high level. This means at full production, the GHG intensity of LNG produced by the NWS Plant in the 2030s is likely to be above 0.7 tCO2e per tonne of LNG shipped, far above the recent state average of about above 0.4 tCO2e per tonne of LNG shipped.
When will global greenhouse gas emissions peak?
The IPCC says peaking before 2025 is a critical step to keep the 1.5°C limit within reach. With emissions set to rise in 2023, this leaves limited time to act. To assess if we can meet this milestone, we look at when global emissions might peak, as well as what we can do to get there in time.
Wind and solar benchmarks for a 1.5°C world
This report presents a detailed methodology for determining the amount of wind and solar capacity that is required for a country to align with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C temperature goal. While the focus of the report is the method, it includes illustrative benchmarks for Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Germany, South Africa.
A 1.5°C future is possible: getting fossil fuels out of the Philippine power sector
The Philippines is also one of the fastest-growing developing countries: poverty is in decline, access to energy is rising and, with that, demand for energy services. However, fossil fuels still dominate the energy system, accounting for 78% of power generation in 2022. This report sets out what the Philippines government needs to do to get the country’s power sector onto a 1.5˚C compatible emissions pathway, replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy.
State of Climate Action 2023
This report finds that global efforts to limit warming to 1.5°C are failing across the board, with recent progress made on every indicator – except electric vehicle sales – lagging behind the pace and scale needed to address the climate crisis.
Production Gap Report 2023
Governments, in aggregate, still plan to produce more than double the amount of fossil fuels in 2030 than would be consistent with limiting warming to 1.5°C. The persistence of the global production gap puts a well-managed and equitable energy transition at risk.
Emissions impossible: Unpacking CSIRO GISERA Beetaloo Middle Arm fossil gas emissions estimates
This report provides an independent evaluation of the CSIRO and GISERA assessments of the potential greenhouse gas emissions that would result from the exploitation of the Beetaloo fossil shale gas reserves.
Coastal loss and damage for small islands
This commentary on a paper in Nature Sustainability reviews how the study quantifies the impacts of sea-level rise on small island states and estimates the impacts in terms of cost, land loss and population exposure across all small islands worldwide.
Adjusting 1.5°C climate change mitigation pathways in light of adverse new information
This study uses an integrated assessment model to explore how 1.5°C pathways could adjust in light of new adverse information, such as a reduced 1.5°C carbon budget, or slower-than-expected low-carbon technology deployment.
Ramping up energy storage: lessons for the EU
This paper explores how the EU can enhance its policy for a low-carbon future by learning from successful energy storage approaches in California, South Korea, and Australia.
Risks of synchronised low yields are underestimated in climate and crop model projections
This study finds that the jet stream – air currents in the upper atmosphere – can synchronise extreme weather caused by climate change, resulting in crop failures in multiple countries at the same time.