Uncertainty in near-term temperature evolution must not obscure assessments of climate mitigation benefits
Authors
Alexandrine Lanson, Peter Pfleiderer, Flavio Lehner, Carl-Friedrich Schleussner
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24d1f/24d1f89a932c870c4fddfa9fa8dc36c53a740eef" alt="Nasa , unsplash"
This study builds on work by Samset et al., who reported that the effects of emission mitigation will only be perceived through global temperature with a multi-decadal delay. This paper provides additional context and expresses concerns with the approach towards assessing a discernible warming response under different greenhouse gas concentration pathways. A broader debate on how to best assess and communicate emerging effects of climate mitigation in the light of natural variability seems warranted.