Only halving emissions by 2030 can minimise risks of crossing cryosphere thresholds
Considering cryosphere and warming uncertainties together implies drastically increased risk of threshold crossing in the cryosphere, even under lower-emission pathways, and underscores the need to halve emissions by 2030 in line with the 1.5 °C limit of the Paris Agreement.
A key risk of climate change is the potential crossing of abrupt and/ or irreversible thresholds, often called tipping points. The need for improved understanding of such risks, as well as what is required to minimize them, is now also explicitly acknowledged by climate policy. ‘Abrupt’ means a much faster change than usual for that system, while ‘irreversible’ on a given timescale means that the system will not be able to recover to its initial state on a similar timescale. Some changes may be reversible on human timescales, after decades or centuries, whereas others may take millennia. For the cryosphere, which is not only particularly vulnerable to climate change but is also a key driver of sea-level rise, the latest IPCC assessment confirms again that several of its elements are susceptible to such threshold behaviour. Examples of these include the potential melting of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets or permafrost thaw.
With the atmosphere already at a current warming of more than 1.1 °C, IPCC assessments indicate that the risk of exceeding thresh- olds is moderate, and could be high with warming above 1.5 °C (using likelihoods as defined in the IPCC reports). Limiting warming in line with the Paris Agreement might still suffice to avoid passing multiple thresholds. The precise nature of Earth system thresholds, however, is subject to considerable uncertainties. While those temperature thresholds are usually accounted for, the range of possible temperature responses to emissions pathways as assessed by the IPCC7 is often less explicitly considered. In the following sections, we discuss both dimensions of uncertainty and implications for risk assessments of cryospheric threshold crossing under different emissions pathways.
Coastal loss and damage for small islands
This commentary on a paper in Nature Sustainability reviews how the study quantifies the impacts of sea-level rise on small island states and estimates the impacts in terms of cost, land loss and population exposure across all small islands worldwide.
Adjusting 1.5°C climate change mitigation pathways in light of adverse new information
This study uses an integrated assessment model to explore how 1.5°C pathways could adjust in light of new adverse information, such as a reduced 1.5°C carbon budget, or slower-than-expected low-carbon technology deployment.
2030 targets aligned to 1.5°C: evidence from the latest global pathways
Our new method applies sustainability limits and minimises the need for carbon dioxide removal to set key 2030 global targets for renewables, fossil fuels and emissions.
The deployment length of solar radiation modification: an interplay of mitigation, net-negative emissions and climate uncertainty
Here, we investigate the deployment timescales of solar radiation modification and how they are affected by different levels of mitigation, net-negative emissions and climate uncertainty.
Emissions as usual: implications for the Safeguard Mechanism of LNG and coal mine projects
This report examines the implications of committed and proposed developments in the LNG and coal mining sectors for reform of Australia's Safeguard Mechanism.
Uncompensated claims to fair emission space risk putting Paris Agreement goals out of reach
How can the EU transform its economy to meet the 1.5°C goal?
What does the 1.5°C goal require from EU climate policy? This 4i-TRACTION policy brief analyses the latest 1.5°C-aligned scenarios and spells out what they imply for EU climate policy.
Institutional decarbonisation scenarios evaluated against the Paris Agreement 1.5°C goal
This study analyses six institutional decarbonisation scenarios published between 2020 and mid 2021 (including four from the oil majors and two from the International Energy Agency. It finds that most of the scenarios would be classified as inconsistent with the Paris Agreement as they fail to limit warming to ‘well below 2 ̊C, let alone 1.5 ̊C, and would exceed the 1.5 ̊C warming limit by a significant margin.
Uncertainty in near-term temperature evolution must not obscure assessments of climate mitigation benefits
This work comments on a study by Samset et al. that found the effects of emission mitigation will only be perceived through global temperature with a multi-decadal delay. This paper provides additional context and expresses concerns with the approach.